Wołoszyn, K., Hohol, M., & Winkielman, P. (2026). Restricting facial mimicry does not impair emotion recognition or influence the evaluation of human affect vocalizations and instrumental sounds. Scientific Reports, 16, Article 14558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43390-2 PDF
Szymanek, P., Senderecka, M., & Hohol, M. (2026). I see moving people: Expectations drive detection of biological motion in noisy point-light displays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 33(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02839-7 PDF
Obidziński, M., Bażela, N., & Hohol, M. (2025). More gist, better math: Fuzzy-trace theory-based investigation of the relationship between long-term memory and mathematical skills. Cognition, 263, 106212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106212 PDF
Baran, B., Obidziński, M., & Hohol, M. (2025). Interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 19, Article 1638374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1638374 PDF
Szymanek, P., Grodniewicz, J. P., & Hohol, M. (2025). Cognitive artifacts in the evolution of cultural systems of beliefs and practices. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 37, 424–355. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-bja10145 PDF
Wołoszyn, K., Hohol, M., Kuniecki, M., & Winkielman, P. (2024). Facing emotional vocalizations and instrumental sounds: Sighted and blind individuals spontaneously and selectively activate facial muscles in response to emotional stimuli. Emotion, 25(4), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001475 PDF
Szymanek, P., Homan, M., van Elk, M., & Hohol, M. (2024). Effects of expectations and sensory unreliability on voice detection: A preregistered study. Consciousness and Cognition, 123, 103718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2024.103718 PDF
Hohol, M., Szymanek, P., & Cipora, K. (2024). Analogue magnitude representation of angles and its relation to geometric expertise. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 8997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59521-6 PDF
Grodniewicz, J. P., & Hohol, M. (2024). Therapeutic chatbots as cognitive-affective artifacts. Topoi, 43, 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10018-x PDF
Hohol, M., & Bażela, N. (2024). Mathematical cognition. In J. Bremer (Ed.), Cognitive science (pp. 223–241). Ignatianum University Press. https://doi.org/10.35765/slowniki.436en PDF
Grodniewicz, J. P., & Hohol, M. (2023). Waiting for a digital therapist: Three challenges on the path to psychotherapy delivered by artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article 1190084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190084 PDF
Grodniewicz, J. P., & Hohol, M. (2023). Therapeutic conversational artificial intelligence and the acquisition of self-understanding. The American Journal of Bioethics, 23(5), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2191021 PDF
Baran, B., Krzyżowski, M., Radai, Z., Francikowski, J., & Hohol, M. (2023). Geometry-based navigation in the dark: Layout symmetry facilitates spatial learning in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, in the absence of visual cues. Animal Cognition, 23, 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.28.886655 PDF
Wołoszyn, K., Hohol, M., Kuniecki, M., & Winkielman, P. (2022). Restricting movements of lower face leaves recognition of emotional vocalizations intact but introduces a valence positivity bias. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 16101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18888-0 PDF
Hohol, M., Wołoszyn, K., & Cipora, K. (2022). No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103765 PDF
Hohol, M., Wołoszyn, K., & Brożek, B. (2021). Making cognitive niches explicit: On the importance of external cognitive representations in accounting for cumulative culture. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 15, Article 734930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2021.734930 PDF
Miłkowski, M., & Hohol, M. (2021). Explanations in cognitive science: Unification versus pluralism. Synthese, 199(Suppl. 1), S1–S17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02777-y PDF
Hohol, M. (2021). Cognitive science: An interdisciplinary approach to mind and cognition. In B. Brożek, M. Jakubiec, & P. Urbańczyk (Eds.), Perspectives on interdisciplinarity (pp. 33–55). Copernicus Center Press. PDF
Hohol, M., Willmes, K., Nęcka, E., Brożek, B., Nuerk, H.-C., & Cipora, K. (2020). Professional mathematicians do not differ from others in the symbolic numerical distance and size effects. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 11531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68202-z PDF
Hohol, M. (2020). Foundations of geometric cognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056291 PDF
Miłkowski, M., Hohol, M., & Nowakowski, P. (2019). Mechanisms in psychology: The road towards unity? Theory & Psychology, 29(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319875218 PDF
Hohol, M., & Miłkowski, M. (2019). Cognitive artifacts for geometric reasoning. Foundations of Science, 24(4), 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09603-w PDF
Miłkowski, M., Hensel, W. M., & Hohol, M. (2018). Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 45(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z PDF
Hohol, M., Wołoszyn, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Cipora, K. (2018). A large-scale survey on finger counting routines, their temporal stability and flexibility in educated adults. PeerJ, 6, Article e5878. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5878 PDF
Miłkowski, M., Clowes, R. W., Rucińska, Z., Przegalińska, A., Zawidzki, T., Gies, A., Krueger, J., McGann, M., Afeltowicz, Ł., Wachowski, W. M., Stjernberg, F., Loughlin, V., & Hohol, M. (2018). From wide cognition to mechanisms: A silent revolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393 PDF
Hohol, M., Baran, B., Krzyżowski, M., & Francikowski, J. (2017). Does spatial navigation have a blind-spot? Visiocentrism is not enough to explain the navigational behavior comprehensively. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, Article 154. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00154 PDF
Wołoszyn, K., & Hohol, M. (2017). Commentary: The poverty of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00845 PDF
Hohol, M., Cipora, K., Willmes, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2017). Bringing back the balance: Domain-general processes are also important in numerical cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00499 PDF
Cipora, K., Hohol, M., Nuerk, H.-C., Willmes, K., Brożek, B., Kucharzyk, B., & Nęcka, E. (2016). Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations. Psychological Research, 80, 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0677-6 PDF
Hohol, M., & Furman, M. (2016). On explanation in neuroscience: The mechanistic framework. In M. Heller, B. Brożek, & M. Hohol (Eds.), The concept of explanation (pp. 207–235). Copernicus Center Press. PDF